Sunday, February 24, 2019

Fire and Ice Analysis

Kailey Ausley Ms. Shumpert English 1102 TGAF 04 April 2013 An Ambiguous means A poetry is used to utter the emotions and experiences of the author. There are four types of numberss narrative, spoken communication poem, didactic, and dramatic. A narrative poem contains a sequence of events in chronological order that tells the reader a story. A dramatic poem is commonly used for onstage performances with dramatic monologue. A lyric poem is songlike, yet the subject matter is not song appropriate. A lyric poem has rime, which is where words look alike, and rhyme, which is where the words sound alike only.A didactic poem t all(prenominal)es the reader morals or a lesson. A reader can, however, bristle many meanings behind the poem due to a certain commission he is feeling or a life experience. In poetry, at that place is no right or wrong meaning. Poetry speaks to each of its readers differently. In Robert icing the pucks poem Fire and Ice, it is both a lyric and didactic p oem. There are several meanings that can be argued in Fire and Ice. Is hoars Fire and Ice close the institution institute the sacking or a past bed that has ended? In the outset two lines, cover writes, Some imagine the world lead end in excitation, / Some say in ice. The first ideal that sum ups to mind when reading these two lines is that the poem is about the debate on how the world go away one day end. Christians moot that the world is passage to end in fire as the Bible says. Second calamus chapter three, verse twelve declares, But the day of the Lord volition come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens go forth pass away with a great noise, and the elements provide melt with longing heat both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. People not of the Christian faith believe that the world is qualifying to end, just not in fire.The Earth one time experienced an ice age, and scientists have deemed it true that this is how the Eart h will end once again. A reader whitethorn not interpret the first two lines to be related to a past relationship in any way. Consequently, the context will probably have a substantial meaning until reading further into the poem. The third and fourth lines however may cause the reader to begin questioning the meaning behind the poem. Frost writes in these lines, From what Ive tasted of desire/ I hold with those who favor fire (Frost 441).Frost states that he has experienced desire at some point in his life, and he delighted in it. Frost could have experienced the love of God and could have known He is existent. Frost could also be using these lines to inform the reader of a passionate relationship. Although the reader does not know exactly what Frost is referring to, it is recognizable that he has a dim passion towards something. Frost writes in lines five through nine, But if it had to fit twice, / I think I know enough of hate/ To say that for destruction ice/ Is also great/ an d would suffice (Frost 441).These five lines give the impression of contradiction to the first four lines. Frost goes from talking about death by fire to death by ice (Frost 441). Frost says though that if he had a second chance he would consume ice. The reader can comprehend here that Frost is saying everything will come to an end eventually. If he is talking about how the world will end, he knows that human death is inevitable and everyone will die. Perhaps Frost is talking about a relationship he knows that all honourable things must come to an end.He would rather the relationship to end in fire, or passion, but if it ends in cold, heartless ice, it is okay because it was going to end at some point (Frost 441). To simply say that this poem was about both of the aforementioned would not be fair. Poetry has its own way with each and every reader. However, there are two things that are certain no matter who the reader is this poem is a didactic because it teaches a lesson and lyr ic because it has rime and rhyme. The lesson of this poem is that everything must come to an end, whether it is good or bad.Frost never revealed the true reason of writing this poem, but he did write it to express his emotions. Maybe he was literally talking about how the world was going to end, or he could have been talking about a scattered relationship. Because Frost never gave the true meaning, the reader is left to let the mental imagery wonder. Without a true meaning, the reader can form his own touch from what speaks to him within the poem. Frost, Robert. Fire and Ice. Backpack Literature An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, And Writing. Ed. X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. New York Pearson, 2012. 441. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.