Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Using the Concept of Network Externalities in Detecting Monopolistic Essay

Using the Concept of Network Externalities in Detecting Monopolistic Practices as in the Case of Microsoft Company - Essay Examplethey are connected in a virtual network. Examples of compatible products are computer hardware and software, phonographs and records, and television sets and programing. In extreme cases, network externalities may cause food markets to split up as when an inferior product tips the network towards adopting it over a superior product because it arrived first (Page & Lopatka, 1999, p.955). A market is said to have tipped when it settles on a single standard for a product, such(prenominal) as software platforms (p.960). Proposition Microsoft acted illegally to extend its monopoly power. Corporate acts deemed anticompetitive are those that foster competition non on the merits, and lead to insufficient distribution compensation. An example is when a sufficiently large number of distributors add to exclusivity over a sufficiently lengthy period, because this tends to drive rival firms out of the market. Distributors who have not by then write up with the dominant firm will then have to profits a monopoly price (Rasmusen, Ramseyer & Wiley, 1991). Microsoft, as dominant firm intending to defend its market position, undertook four actions with regard to Internet explorer (IE) vis-a-vis original dominant browser, Netscape Navigator (1) Microsoft invested massively in browser technology (2) IE was zero-priced (3) Microsoft signed exclusive distribution contract with Internet access providers and (4) Microsoft bundled IE with Windows. The court found that investment in browser technology and zero pricing were not uncompetitive, but declared exclusive distribution contracts and secure or bundling arrangements as uncompetitive (Klein, 2001, pp.46-47). Arguments in favor of illegality Microsoft engaged in actively tipping the market, thereof preventing the adoption of what could...This paper offers a comprehensive review of the concept of n etwork externalities and its practical applications in back up to detect the uncompetitive actions from companies. Using the example of the Microsoft company, the essay exhibits its possible excessive use of dominant market position, through the help of provisions of network externalities theoryIn separate cases, governments (the US and EU) and attorneys in categorize action suits claimed that Microsofts contracts with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) were exclusionary and anticompetitive, thereby maintaining its operating system (OS) and later its internet browser. These allegedly caused consumers to pay higher prices, discouraged innovation, and restricted trade in violation of the Sherman Act. Microsoft countered that it was not a monopoly because it still confront strong competition in a dynamic industry its success was procompetitive because consumers benefited from its software distribution and deception of antitrust remedies would reduce innovation instead of encour aging it.Corporate acts deemed anticompetitive are those that foster competition not on the merits, and lead to insufficient distribution compensation. Microsofts OS provided a platform with network and family effects, and its contracts, time exhibiting some arguably anticompetitive characteristics such as imposing penalties, also includes terms that provide exceptional encourage to its customers that, as in the case of AOL, tangibly improve their businesses.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.